The Cincinnati Enquirer, Nov. 20
… No question, the Paris attacks are an abomination to humanity and blasphemous in any religion. We stand stricken and outraged. Even fearful. We feel Parisians’ vulnerability, the soft underbelly of an open society. We probe our own weaknesses, and ponder our response toward the group that claimed the attacks as its own – the Islamic State, a terrorist entity that pretends to champion Islam…
The call from some of our political leaders to halt the flow of a modest number of Syrian refugees – estimated to be 10,000 – into this country, half of whom are children, is a knee-jerk solution looking for a problem…
The selective nature of the proposed moratorium – targeting refugees from only one country – is also troubling because there’s no confirmed, direct link between Syrian refugees and the Paris attacks. All the suspects identified so far hailed from France or Belgium. The call to block Syrian refugees is being made despite the evidence, not because of it…
Our refugee resettlement program – yes, even for Syrians – represents a core American value, one that reflects and continues our identity as a melting pot. We are a country founded and fueled by immigrants. We are a nation powered by the proposition that we value oppressed people – of all colors and creeds – who seek shelter.
The moratorium call is a troubling overreaction. Yes, we are concerned about national security and our collective safety. In the face of that worry, however, we must remind the world and ourselves that America is greater than its fears.
The (Findlay) Courier, Nov. 21
Even with a grain of salt, a recent report from the Center for Public Integrity casts a shadow on Ohio.
The report, issued earlier this month, looked at 13 categories of laws and practices common to each state. It concluded that state governments, as a whole, are “plagued by conflicts of interests and cozy relationships between lawmakers and lobbyists, while open-records and ethics laws are often toothless and laced with exemptions.”
Some states do better than others when it comes to playing by the rules.
Ohio managed to come out near the top, at sixth, but a closer look suggests the state is doing more wrong than right on the integrity scale.
The state received an overall grade of D-plus, and, perhaps most troubling to government watchdogs, got an F for overall access to public information.
That reinforces something that many have known for years, that providing ready access to public records and complying with public meetings laws are low priorities for too many government offices…
Ohioans deserve more than lip service from politicians who talk transparency when they campaign, but do little to improve it once elected. Lawmakers must stop making more public records off limits and creating loopholes that allow officials to conduct public business in the dark…
The Lima News, Nov. 21
If you are old enough to remember when the Republican Party bragged of having a “big tent,” with room for many people with diverse views, you are getting plenty old indeed.
There used to be several brands of conservatism. There were fiscal conservatives and social conservatives and conservatives who focused primarily on national security. Though there still are, at least nominally, many don’t want it to be so.
Imagine someone who is generally conservative in his views who just happens also to support abortion rights. Could he find a home in today’s Republican Party? Good luck…
To listen to much that passes for discourse today, one would believe that what it means to be a conservative can be boiled down to a few simple statements: Cut taxes. Shrink the federal government. Oppose Obama and anything he stands for.
Oh, and never, ever deign to work with the opposition party.
Down that road lies a whole lot of nothing.
When Ronald Reagan was president, he beefed up our nation’s military, boosting troops and weapons and programs and research and development. During his two terms, military spending increased by a stunning 43 percent.
Would today’s so-called conservatives brand him a spendthrift liberal?
A thriving political movement needs to stand for something. It needs a broad vision and leaders who are able to articulate a series of goals and how best to attain them. Simply wanting to cut, to reduce, to oppose, to repeal – that isn’t a governing philosophy. It’s a never-ending fit of pique.