Last updated: July 08. 2014 12:50PM - 85 Views
By Jeremy Wallace



Story Tools:

Font Size:

Social Media:

According to the Evansville Courier & Press: same-sex marriage inevitable; Indiana should let issue go


Whatever the state of Indiana tries to do to stop same-sex marriages, it is inevitable that gay marriages will ultimately become legal in Indiana, as they should.


This is an issue headed squarely for the U.S. Supreme Court, which we expected will eventually declare it the law of the land, and not just in Indiana. The court is expected to declare that it is unconstitutional to forbid same-sex couples to wed.


In Indiana on Wednesday, Evansville-based U.S. District Court Judge Richard Young struck down the state’s prohibition of same-sex marriage. With Wednesday’s court decision, Indiana became the 20th state to adopt same-sex marriage. Indeed, Indiana became the ninth state to allow same-sex marriage based on a court decision.


Although Young’s decision sent numerous same-sex couples to courthouses for marriage license, the office of Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller filed a notice of appeal with the federal appellate court in Chicago.


The AG’s office says it is premature to require Indiana to change it definition of marriage — only between a man and a woman — until the U.S. Supreme Court decides the issue.


Depending on time, Indiana officials may attempt as well to try again for a state constitutional amendment to ban same sex marriages in Indiana. What a waste of time and reputation for Indiana that would be.


Earlier this year, pro-same sex advocates succeeded in persuading the Indiana Legislature not to approve a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriages. Lawmakers did approve a ban, but only after changing the language to take out a clause banning recognition of civil unions. That change in language pushed any vote on the proposed amendment back to 2016 or later. By then, we would expect that the U.S. Supreme Court will have ended this nonsense. Indeed, legal experts believe the issue would be moot by 2016.


Young held correctly that Indiana’s ban on gay marriage violated the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution


“These couples, when gender and sexual orientation are taken away, are in all respects like the family down the street. The Constitutional demands that we treat them as such. …”


Regardless, this is a decision that is, by all rights, should assure gay and lesbian citizens the right to be treated equally.


Indiana does not need a referendum on the rights of same-sex couples, only a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Comments
comments powered by Disqus


Featured Businesses


Poll



Info Minute